More on the item below.
Unable to refute Steyn’s statistics and facts, or to deny that the portions of the article they found most offensive were in fact chilling quotations made by radical Muslims themselves, Steyn’s accusers condemned his “tone,” use of “sarcasm,” and reliance upon “subtle intellectual arguments.”
Got that? Subtle intellectual arguments = Hate crime. Especially if the self-appoint arbiters of "hate" don't like your tone.
Posted by Quentin George at June 12, 2008 08:20 PM