The SMH carries news on the Gospel of Judas, which presents Judas in a far more flattering light than the canonical gospels.
What I don't get is why report on this now? This gospel has been common knowledge for some time.
Anyway, I prefer the "Apocalypse of Peter", which contains, amongst other things a talking cross and the resurrection of a fish.
On the topic of non-canonical, I always find it amusing that a portion of the fradulent "Infancy Gospel of Thomas" ended up in the Qu'ran.
Maybe Allah just liked the story...
Posted by Quentin George at April 7, 2006 07:42 PM